Emergency rule in Pakistan: Your views

Send us your thoughts on President Pervez Musharraf's decision to impose emergency rule in Pakistan. Read more


Seeing the light of day

Oh, the light! The autumn light! Is there anything more glorious than an October day, awash in the sun's low-slung amber rays? And yet ... perhaps you feel the dread, too. Read more


In the first place, simple pleasures were fun and free

Sunday, November 04, 2007 November marks the first anniversary of Tales of the City. During the past year, we've received personal essays on every sort of topic: geek love, accidental encounters, the saving grace of music and dealing with cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Read more


Black: Have it all,or have what makes you happy

Saturday, November 03, 2007 NEW YORK — There's a phrase that came into vogue awhile back: "having it all. Read more


The immigration question, from a historical perspective

Saturday, November 03, 2007 Gregory Rodriguez lends a scholarly voice to the national shouting match over immigration, and anyone interested in historical context should listen to him. Read more


All news [archive] RSS




Read more news here:



Thompson: "Wrong Answer"

Thompson: "Wrong Answer"

Fred Thompson has some thoughts on Hillary: I've mentioned it before, but Fred does very well in this kind of informal chat video, which is not really an ad. But what if this is what Fred's ads will look like?...



PARKER: Waffling, not being a woman, makes Hillary a target

Saturday, November 03, 2007

When you're leading the Democratic presidential race, as Hillary Clinton is, you might expect other candidates to focus their sharpest criticism your way.

Yet the spin coming out of the Clinton campaign is that the men were ganging up on Hillary. Sorry, but when girls insist on playing hardball with the boys, they don't get to cry foul — or change the game to dodge ball — when they get bruised.

Not that Clinton did any whining herself following Tuesday night's Democratic presidential debate in Philadelphia. She's too smart for that. But somehow the idea magically surfaced that the men were piling on.

The New York Times reported that Clinton's campaign officials tried to create sympathy for Hillary the same way they did when Republican Rick Lazio confronted her during their 2000 Senate race. A Clinton adviser told The Washington Post that, "Ultimately, it was six guys against her, and she came off as one strong woman." A headline on the Drudge Report said: "Scorn: As the Men Gang Up."

Piffle.

Hillary's campaign people took swift advantage of her status as assault victim. A clever video, "The Politics of Pile-On," shows in rapid-fire succession the other candidates mentioning Clinton's name and ends with her saying:

"I seem to be the topic of great conversation and consternation, and that's for a reason."

There's a reason, all right. Hillary's having her cake and eating everybody else's, too. It must be frustrating to challengers who need to attack her positions, but fear the inevitable piling-on accusations and the appearance of bullying a woman.

In debate post-mortems, moderators Brian Williams and Tim Russert were also accused of joining the pile-on, especially Russert, who kept pounding Hillary for straight answers when she tended to "bridge" to other topics.When asked, for example, whether she supports New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's proposal to issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, as Clinton apparently said she did to a New Hampshire newspaper, she circled the question.

She wasn't necessarily for it, but she wasn't necessarily against it. She wouldn't necessarily support it, but she could understand why Spitzer was doing it: to address the failure of the Bush administration, of course. She also mentioned Congress' failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, who deserves a more prominent place in the Democratic lineup, seemed to better understand the concept of answering a question.

No, he said, a driver's license is a privilege and illegal immigrants don't get one. How hard was that? Pretty hard, apparently, if you don't want to offend a single Spanish-speaking voter.

Hillary also refused to answer candidly when asked whether she would release communications between her and then-President Bill Clinton that might illuminate her claims to White House experience. The former president has ordered all records kept sealed until 2012, but Hillary's response suggested that she has no choice in the matter. She can't ask her husband to lift the ban?

In another instance, Russert asked three times whether Hillary would pledge to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. Hillary gave three answers that were sort of yes-ish, but that left uncomfortable wiggle room for failure. She pledged "to do everything I can to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb."

Why not just say, "Yes, I pledge"? She can still try diplomatic approaches, including carrots and sticks, as she mentioned, but why not simply say Iran won't get the bomb under her watch?

Getting a straight answer from Hillary is consistently challenging, as other candidates noted — hence the many "Hillary" references. Their "attacks" weren't only because Hillary leads the pack, but because she's cagey to a fault.

At times, Hillary's relationship to nuance borders on compulsion more than wisdom. If her husband triangulated, she pentagonates. She's been working so many sides for so long that she seems incapable of yes or no.

Hillary can handle the men just fine. What's giving her problems is Hillary.

Original text is here



  Add comment

Name: 
E-Mail: 
Comment: 
Enter code: 


Main page | Rss feeds | News archive | All news | |